<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turmoil in Mumbai and Bangkok: A Setback for Liberalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atlasnetwork.org/networknews/2008/12/turmoil-in-mumbai-and-bangkok-a-setback-to-liberalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atlasnetwork.org/networknews/2008/12/turmoil-in-mumbai-and-bangkok-a-setback-to-liberalism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:02:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nonoy Oplas, Philippines</title>
		<link>http://atlasnetwork.org/networknews/2008/12/turmoil-in-mumbai-and-bangkok-a-setback-to-liberalism/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Nonoy Oplas, Philippines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlasnetwork.org/?p=1487#comment-139</guid>
		<description>William, my statement to &quot;over-regulate criminals&quot; and &quot;under-regulate business&quot; is a policy. How it will be implemented depends on the seriousness of a government to implement the rule of law. If the State is concentrated in establishing peace and order, and it&#039;s not busy with bail-outs, regulating and taxing various business left and right, providing various welfare programs and subsidies, then the State&#039;s primary role of protecting the citizens&#039; right to life, right to private property ownership, right to voluntary exchange and trade, will be fulfilled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William, my statement to &#8220;over-regulate criminals&#8221; and &#8220;under-regulate business&#8221; is a policy. How it will be implemented depends on the seriousness of a government to implement the rule of law. If the State is concentrated in establishing peace and order, and it&#8217;s not busy with bail-outs, regulating and taxing various business left and right, providing various welfare programs and subsidies, then the State&#8217;s primary role of protecting the citizens&#8217; right to life, right to private property ownership, right to voluntary exchange and trade, will be fulfilled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William deB. Mills</title>
		<link>http://atlasnetwork.org/networknews/2008/12/turmoil-in-mumbai-and-bangkok-a-setback-to-liberalism/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>William deB. Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 22:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlasnetwork.org/?p=1487#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Your &quot;over-regulate criminals&quot; comment sounds great, but perhaps a couple of caveats are in order. One, make sure the guy you collared is actually the criminal. He might have been arrested by mistake. Then there&#039;s the old &quot;one man&#039;s terrorist is another man&#039;s freedom fighter&quot; problem. What do you call a Lashkar e-Toiba guy who attacks an Indian soldier in Kashmir, for example? Two, make sure you regulate all the criminals. The fact that a government orders crime or looks the other way and allows it does not make it OK. Specific examples one might point to include the US campaign against Fallujah, the Gujarat state government massacre of Moslems, Jenin, the Russian leveling of Grozniy, the egregious risk-taking by certain Wall Street CEO&#039;s with other people&#039;s money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;over-regulate criminals&#8221; comment sounds great, but perhaps a couple of caveats are in order. One, make sure the guy you collared is actually the criminal. He might have been arrested by mistake. Then there&#8217;s the old &#8220;one man&#8217;s terrorist is another man&#8217;s freedom fighter&#8221; problem. What do you call a Lashkar e-Toiba guy who attacks an Indian soldier in Kashmir, for example? Two, make sure you regulate all the criminals. The fact that a government orders crime or looks the other way and allows it does not make it OK. Specific examples one might point to include the US campaign against Fallujah, the Gujarat state government massacre of Moslems, Jenin, the Russian leveling of Grozniy, the egregious risk-taking by certain Wall Street CEO&#8217;s with other people&#8217;s money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Insight into the Mumbai Attacks &#160;&#124;&#160;Atlas Network</title>
		<link>http://atlasnetwork.org/networknews/2008/12/turmoil-in-mumbai-and-bangkok-a-setback-to-liberalism/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>More Insight into the Mumbai Attacks &#160;&#124;&#160;Atlas Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlasnetwork.org/?p=1487#comment-137</guid>
		<description>[...] Priscilla wrote an excellent post offering various perspectives about the tragedy in Mumbai from our friends in Asia. Here in the U.S. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Priscilla wrote an excellent post offering various perspectives about the tragedy in Mumbai from our friends in Asia. Here in the U.S. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

